GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT

6.1: Institutional Vision and Leadership

6.1.1: The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the vision and mission of the institution

6.1.2: The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management

6.2: Strategy Development and Deployment

6.2.1: The institutional Strategic / Perspective plan is effectively deployed

6.2.2: The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules and procedures, etc.

6.2.3: Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation 1.Administration, 2. Finance and Accounts, 3.Student Admission and Support, 4. Examination

6.3: Faculty Empowerment Strategies

6.3.1: The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff

6.3.2: Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years

6.3.3: Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five years

6.3.4: Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face  Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)during the last five years (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course ).

6.3.5: Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff

6.4: Financial Management and Resource Mobilization

6.4.1: Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly

6.4.2: Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropers during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III)

6.4.3: Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources

6.5: Internal Quality Assurance System

6.5.1: Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes

6.5.2: The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities ( For first cycle  - Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality For  second and subsequent cycles  - Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives)

6.5.3: Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:

1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements, 2. Collaborative quality intitiatives with other institution(s),

3. Participation in NIRF, 4. any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA)